According to the 2021 census, White City had a total of 17,860 usual residents residing in 4,202 households, indicating an average household size of 2.5. The borough covers an area of 34.7 square kilometers resulting in a population density of 17,860.5 individuals per square kilometer. The average age of its residents was 34.7 years.
Religion: In White City, the ‘Christian’ community represents the largest religious group, making up 40.38% of the population, ‘Muslim’ population follows at 24.68% and ‘No religion’ is 3rd with 23.76%
Ethnic groups: The predominant ethnic group in White City is ‘White’, constituting 43.12% of the total population. The ‘Black, Black British, Black Welsh, Caribbean or African’ ethnic group is second largest, making up 26.67%, while ‘Asian, Asian British or Asian Welsh’ accounts for 12.81%.
Economic activity: 63.67% of White City’s population is economically active. The primary job roles are ‘Professional occupations’ and ‘Associate professional and technical’
Health: Majority of the population are in very good health. Most common age groups are those aged 35 to 49 years and aged 50 to 64 years. Additionally, 29.59% of its inhabitants is married and 56.79% are single.
Living Arrangements and Property Types: Majority of the households are Single family households (53.73%). Most of the properties in White City are flats, with the majority of the ownership either being social rented or private rented
Crime rate: As of 2022, White City crime rate (crime per 1000 residents) stands at 199.85. Most common crime types are ‘Anti-social behaviour’, ‘Violence and sexual offences’ and ‘Other theft’.
White City in comparision with 21 Hammersmith and Fulham wards
When we analyze the percentage distribution of population and households, we see that White City surpasses most of Hammersmith and Fulham wards in the following metrics.
Prominent demographics insights:
- Age:
- Aged 10 to 15 years- Rank (2)
- Aged 16 to 19 years- Rank (2)
- Aged 5 to 9 years- Rank (4)
- Economic activity status:
- Economically active and a full-time student- Rank (4)
- Economically inactive- Rank (9)
- Ethnic group:
- Black, Black British, Black Welsh, Caribbean or African- Rank (1)
- Other ethnic group- Rank (3)
- Asian, Asian British or Asian Welsh- Rank (4)
- General health:
- Fair health- Rank (6)
- Good health- Rank (7)
- Bad health- Rank (8)
- Marital and civil partnership status:
- Separated, but still legally married or still legally in a civil partnership- Rank (2)
- Divorced or civil partnership dissolved- Rank (4)
Prominent household insights:
- Accommodation type:
- Flats- Rank (1)
- Converted building. Eg school, church- Rank (8)
- Commercial building. Eg office, hotel, shop- Rank (9)
- Household composition:
- Single family household- Rank (5)
- Other household types- Rank (7)
- Household deprivation:
- Household is deprived in one dimension- Rank (3)
- Household is deprived in three dimensions- Rank (3)
- Household is deprived in four dimensions- Rank (3)
- Tenure of household:
- Social rented- Rank (3)
- Shared ownership- Rank (6)
Unlock Insights: Explore, Compare, and Visualize White City data
Explore the detailed composition and makeup of White City‘s census data through an easy-to-use UI, featuring interactive visualization tools. Analyze how White City compares to other wards within Hammersmith and Fulham.
View all insights
Property types in White City
Accommodation Type | Total | % of Households |
---|---|---|
Flats | 2,856 | 68.02 |
Converted or shared house | 685 | 16.31 |
Terraced | 384 | 9.15 |
Semi-detached | 103 | 2.45 |
Commercial building. Eg office, hotel, shop | 78 | 1.86 |
Converted building. Eg school, church | 54 | 1.29 |
Detached | 37 | 0.88 |
Caravan or other mobile structure | 2 | 0.05 |
How does White City compare to other wards in Hammersmith and Fulham ?
Use the dropdown to compare all the 21 wards.
Rank of White City when compared against Hammersmith and Fulham wards.
Accommodation Type | Rank | % of Households |
---|---|---|
Flats | 1 | 68.02 |
Converted building. Eg school, church | 8 | 1.29 |
Commercial building. Eg office, hotel, shop | 9 | 1.86 |
Detached | 11 | 0.88 |
Caravan or other mobile structure | 13 | 0.05 |
Semi-detached | 15 | 2.45 |
Terraced | 18 | 9.15 |
Converted or shared house | 18 | 16.31 |
Property ownership in White City
- Social rented – 45.75% (1,922)
- Rents from council or Local Authority – 34.94% (1,468)
- Other social rented – 10.81% (454)
- Private rented – 30.52% (1,282)
- Private landlord or letting agency – 28.33% (1,190)
- Other private rented – 2.19% (92)
- Owned – 21.66% (910)
- Owns with a mortgage or loan – 11.97% (503)
- Owns outright – 9.69% (407)
- Shared ownership – 1.67% (70)
- Shared ownership – 1.67% (70)
How does White City compare to other wards in Hammersmith and Fulham ?
Rank of White City when compared against Hammersmith and Fulham wards.
- Social rented – rank – 3 (45.75%)
- Rents from council or Local Authority – rank – 1 (34.94%)
- Other social rented – rank – 17 (10.81%)
- Shared ownership – rank – 6 (1.67%)
- Shared ownership – rank – 6 (1.67%)
- Private rented – rank – 18 (30.52%)
- Private landlord or letting agency – rank – 18 (28.33%)
- Other private rented – rank – 18 (2.19%)
- Owned – rank – 19 (21.66%)
- Owns with a mortgage or loan – rank – 19 (11.97%)
- Owns outright – rank – 20 (9.69%)
Families in White City
- Single family household – 53.73% (2,255)
- Married or civil partnership couple – 21.49% (902)
- Dependent children – 11.84% (497)
- No children – 5.81% (244)
- All children non-dependent – 3.84% (161)
- Lone parent family – 19.44% (816)
- With dependent children – 11.44% (480)
- All children non-dependent – 8.01% (336)
- Cohabiting couple family – 8.82% (370)
- No children – 6.10% (256)
- With dependent children – 2.24% (94)
- All children non-dependent – 0.48% (20)
- Other single family household – 2.50% (105)
- Other family composition – 2.50% (105)
- All aged 66 years and over – 1.48% (62)
- One person household – 31.33% (1,315)
- Other – 24.85% (1,043)
- Aged 66 years and over – 6.48% (272)
- Other household types – 14.94% (627)
- Other, including all full-time students and all aged 66 years and over – 11.08% (465)
- With dependent children – 3.86% (162)
How does White City compare to other wards in Hammersmith and Fulham ?
Rank of White City when compared against Hammersmith and Fulham wards.
- Single family household – rank – 5 (53.73%)
- Lone parent family – rank – 1 (19.44%)
- With dependent children – rank – 1 (11.44%)
- All children non-dependent – rank – 3 (8.01%)
- Other single family household – rank – 8 (2.50%)
- Other family composition – rank – 8 (2.50%)
- Married or civil partnership couple – rank – 10 (21.49%)
- All children non-dependent – rank – 5 (3.84%)
- Dependent children – rank – 10 (11.84%)
- No children – rank – 19 (5.81%)
- All aged 66 years and over – rank – 19 (1.48%)
- Cohabiting couple family – rank – 19 (8.82%)
- With dependent children – rank – 1 (2.24%)
- All children non-dependent – rank – 6 (0.48%)
- No children – rank – 19 (6.10%)
- Other household types – rank – 7 (14.94%)
- With dependent children – rank – 2 (3.86%)
- Other, including all full-time students and all aged 66 years and over – rank – 10 (11.08%)
- One person household – rank – 17 (31.33%)
- Other – rank – 15 (24.85%)
- Aged 66 years and over – rank – 21 (6.48%)
White City household deprivation
Household Deprivation | Total | % of Households |
---|---|---|
Household is not deprived in any dimension | 1,746 | 41.55 |
Household is deprived in one dimension | 1,494 | 35.55 |
Household is deprived in two dimensions | 697 | 16.59 |
Household is deprived in three dimensions | 242 | 5.76 |
Household is deprived in four dimensions | 23 | 0.55 |
How does White City compare to other wards in Hammersmith and Fulham ?
Rank of White City when compared against Hammersmith and Fulham wards.
Household Deprivation | Rank | % of Households |
---|---|---|
Household is deprived in one dimension | 3 | 35.55 |
Household is deprived in three dimensions | 3 | 5.76 |
Household is deprived in four dimensions | 3 | 0.55 |
Household is deprived in two dimensions | 4 | 16.59 |
Household is not deprived in any dimension | 19 | 41.55 |
Household sizes in White City
Household Size | Total | % of Households |
---|---|---|
1 person in household | 1,315 | 31.29 |
2 people in household | 1,236 | 29.41 |
3 people in household | 752 | 17.89 |
4 people in household | 465 | 11.06 |
5 people in household | 248 | 5.9 |
6 people in household | 108 | 2.57 |
7 people in household | 41 | 0.98 |
8 or more people in household | 38 | 0.9 |
How does White City compare to other wards in Hammersmith and Fulham ?
Rank of White City when compared against Hammersmith and Fulham wards.
Household Size | Rank | % of Households |
---|---|---|
8 or more people in household | 1 | 0.9 |
0 people in household | 1 | 0 |
3 people in household | 2 | 17.89 |
6 people in household | 2 | 2.57 |
7 people in household | 2 | 0.98 |
5 people in household | 3 | 5.9 |
4 people in household | 7 | 11.06 |
1 person in household | 17 | 31.29 |
2 people in household | 19 | 29.41 |
Age groups of White City residents
Age | Total | % of Usual residents |
---|---|---|
Aged 35 to 49 years | 2,214 | 21.31 |
Aged 50 to 64 years | 1,709 | 16.45 |
Aged 25 to 34 years | 942 | 9.07 |
Aged 10 to 15 years | 851 | 8.19 |
Aged 5 to 9 years | 574 | 5.53 |
Aged 4 years and under | 532 | 5.12 |
Aged 65 to 74 years | 506 | 4.87 |
Aged 16 to 19 years | 505 | 4.86 |
Aged 75 to 84 years | 256 | 2.46 |
Aged 85 years and over | 81 | 0.78 |
How does White City compare to other wards in Hammersmith and Fulham ?
Rank of White City when compared against Hammersmith and Fulham wards.
Age | Rank | % of Usual residents |
---|---|---|
Aged 10 to 15 years | 2 | 8.19 |
Aged 16 to 19 years | 2 | 4.86 |
Aged 5 to 9 years | 4 | 5.53 |
Aged 4 years and under | 8 | 5.12 |
Aged 25 to 34 years | 11 | 9.07 |
Aged 50 to 64 years | 12 | 16.45 |
Aged 35 to 49 years | 15 | 21.31 |
Aged 85 years and over | 20 | 0.78 |
Aged 65 to 74 years | 21 | 4.87 |
Aged 75 to 84 years | 21 | 2.46 |
Gender breakdown in White City
Sex | Total | % of Usual residents |
---|---|---|
Female | 5,529 | 53.2 |
Male | 4,864 | 46.8 |
How does White City compare to other wards in Hammersmith and Fulham ?
Rank of White City when compared against Hammersmith and Fulham wards.
Sex | Rank | % of Usual residents |
---|---|---|
Female | 8 | 53.2 |
Male | 14 | 46.8 |
White City Health status
General Health | Total | % of Usual residents |
---|---|---|
Very good health | 5,869 | 56.47 |
Good health | 3,032 | 29.17 |
Fair health | 1,025 | 9.86 |
Bad health | 359 | 3.45 |
Very bad health | 108 | 1.04 |
How does White City compare to other wards in Hammersmith and Fulham ?
Rank of White City when compared against Hammersmith and Fulham wards.
General Health | Rank | % of Usual residents |
---|---|---|
Fair health | 6 | 9.86 |
Good health | 7 | 29.17 |
Bad health | 8 | 3.45 |
Very bad health | 12 | 1.04 |
Very good health | 14 | 56.47 |
Relationship status amongst White City Residents
- Never married and never registered a civil partnership – 56.79% (4,793)
- Married or in a registered civil partnership – 29.59% (2,497)
- Married – 29.25% (2,469)
- Opposite sex – 28.95% (2,443)
- Same sex – 0.31% (26)
- In a registered civil partnership – 0.33% (28)
- Same sex – 0.25% (21)
- Opposite sex – 0.08% (7)
- Divorced or civil partnership dissolved – 7.97% (673)
- Divorced – 7.95% (671)
- Formerly in a civil partnership now legally dissolved – 0.02% (2)
- Widowed or surviving civil partnership partner – 2.88% (243)
- Widowed – 2.84% (240)
- Surviving partner from civil partnership – 0.04% (3)
- Separated, but still legally married or still legally in a civil partnership – 2.77% (234)
- Separated, but still married – 2.77% (234)
- Separated, but still in a registered civil partnership – 0.00% (0)
How does White City compare to other wards in Hammersmith and Fulham ?
Rank of White City when compared against Hammersmith and Fulham wards.
- Separated, but still legally married or still legally in a civil partnership – rank – 2 (2.77%)
- Separated, but still married – rank – 2 (2.77%)
- Separated, but still in a registered civil partnership – rank – 17 (0.00%)
- Divorced or civil partnership dissolved – rank – 4 (7.97%)
- Divorced – rank – 4 (7.95%)
- Formerly in a civil partnership now legally dissolved – rank – 16 (0.02%)
- Married or in a registered civil partnership – rank – 11 (29.59%)
- Married – rank – 11 (29.25%)
- Opposite sex – rank – 11 (28.95%)
- Same sex – rank – 19 (0.31%)
- In a registered civil partnership – rank – 16 (0.33%)
- Opposite sex – rank – 13 (0.08%)
- Same sex – rank – 15 (0.25%)
- Never married and never registered a civil partnership – rank – 13 (56.79%)
- Widowed or surviving civil partnership partner – rank – 13 (2.88%)
- Surviving partner from civil partnership – rank – 4 (0.04%)
- Widowed – rank – 14 (2.84%)
White City residents’ country of birth
- Europe – 69.20% (7,192)
- United Kingdom – 51.70% (5,373)
- EU countries – 14.25% (1,481)
- European Union EU14 – 9.70% (1,008)
- European Union EU8 – 3.14% (326)
- European Union EU2 – 1.07% (111)
- All other EU countries – 0.35% (36)
- Non-EU countries – 3.25% (338)
- All other non-EU countries – 3.25% (338)
- Africa – 12.83% (1,333)
- Middle East and Asia – 11.38% (1,183)
- The Americas and the Caribbean – 5.71% (593)
- Antarctica and Oceania (including Australasia) and Other – 0.80% (83)
- British Overseas – 0.09% (9)
How does White City compare to other wards in Hammersmith and Fulham ?
Rank of White City when compared against Hammersmith and Fulham wards.
- Africa – rank – 1 (12.83%)
- British Overseas – rank – 2 (0.09%)
- Middle East and Asia – rank – 6 (11.38%)
- The Americas and the Caribbean – rank – 18 (5.71%)
- Europe – rank – 20 (69.20%)
- Non-EU countries – rank – 10 (3.25%)
- All other non-EU countries – rank – 10 (3.25%)
- United Kingdom – rank – 14 (51.70%)
- EU countries – rank – 21 (14.25%)
- European Union EU8 – rank – 4 (3.14%)
- European Union EU2 – rank – 12 (1.07%)
- All other EU countries – rank – 15 (0.35%)
- European Union EU14 – rank – 21 (9.70%)
- Antarctica and Oceania (including Australasia) and Other – rank – 21 (0.80%)
Passport records of White City residents
- Europe – 87.84% (9,128)
- United Kingdom – 70.05% (7,280)
- Other Europe – 16.11% (1,674)
- EU Member countries – 14.95% (1,554)
- Other EU countries – 3.79% (394)
- Italy – 2.85% (296)
- Spain – 1.87% (194)
- Poland – 1.68% (175)
- France – 1.57% (163)
- Portugal – 1.40% (146)
- Romania – 0.72% (75)
- Germany – 0.61% (63)
- Lithuania – 0.46% (48)
- Rest of Europe – 1.15% (120)
- Other Europe – 0.93% (97)
- Turkey – 0.22% (23)
- Ireland – 1.67% (174)
- No passport held – 4.88% (507)
- Middle East and Asia – 3.60% (374)
- South-East Asia – 1.25% (130)
- Eastern Asia – 1.21% (126)
- Southern Asia – 0.73% (76)
- Middle East – 0.39% (41)
- Central Asia – 0.01% (1)
- The Americas and the Caribbean – 1.77% (184)
- North America and the Caribbean – 1.02% (106)
- Central and South America – 0.75% (78)
- Africa – 1.36% (141)
- Central and Western Africa – 0.71% (74)
- North Africa – 0.38% (39)
- South and Eastern Africa – 0.27% (28)
- Antarctica and Oceania, including Australasia – 0.55% (57)
How does White City compare to other wards in Hammersmith and Fulham ?
Rank of White City when compared against Hammersmith and Fulham wards.
- British Overseas Territories – rank – 1 (0.00%)
- No passport held – rank – 2 (4.88%)
- Africa – rank – 3 (1.36%)
- Central and Western Africa – rank – 1 (0.71%)
- North Africa – rank – 9 (0.38%)
- South and Eastern Africa – rank – 17 (0.27%)
- Europe – rank – 8 (87.84%)
- United Kingdom – rank – 5 (70.05%)
- Other Europe – rank – 16 (16.11%)
- Rest of Europe – rank – 15 (1.15%)
- Turkey – rank – 13 (0.22%)
- Other Europe – rank – 14 (0.93%)
- EU Member countries – rank – 16 (14.95%)
- Poland – rank – 2 (1.68%)
- Portugal – rank – 3 (1.40%)
- Lithuania – rank – 4 (0.46%)
- Romania – rank – 7 (0.72%)
- Other EU countries – rank – 11 (3.79%)
- Italy – rank – 15 (2.85%)
- Spain – rank – 15 (1.87%)
- Germany – rank – 17 (0.61%)
- France – rank – 20 (1.57%)
- Ireland – rank – 20 (1.67%)
- Middle East and Asia – rank – 12 (3.60%)
- South-East Asia – rank – 6 (1.25%)
- Eastern Asia – rank – 11 (1.21%)
- Middle East – rank – 12 (0.39%)
- Southern Asia – rank – 12 (0.73%)
- Central Asia – rank – 13 (0.01%)
- The Americas and the Caribbean – rank – 19 (1.77%)
- Central and South America – rank – 15 (0.75%)
- North America and the Caribbean – rank – 19 (1.02%)
- Antarctica and Oceania, including Australasia – rank – 21 (0.55%)
Ethnic groups in White City
- White – 43.12% (4,482)
- English, Welsh, Scottish, Northern Irish or British – 23.98% (2,493)
- Other White – 16.38% (1,703)
- Irish – 1.94% (202)
- Roma – 0.75% (78)
- Gypsy or Irish Traveller – 0.06% (6)
- Black, Black British, Black Welsh, Caribbean or African – 26.67% (2,772)
- African – 18.75% (1,949)
- Caribbean – 5.62% (584)
- Other Black – 2.30% (239)
- Asian, Asian British or Asian Welsh – 12.81% (1,331)
- Other Asian – 5.74% (597)
- Pakistani – 1.91% (199)
- Bangladeshi – 1.83% (190)
- Chinese – 1.81% (188)
- Indian – 1.51% (157)
- Other ethnic group – 9.84% (1,023)
- Any other ethnic group – 5.82% (605)
- Arab – 4.02% (418)
- Mixed or Multiple ethnic groups – 7.56% (786)
- Other Mixed or Multiple ethnic groups – 2.69% (280)
- White and Black Caribbean – 2.16% (224)
- White and Asian – 1.51% (157)
- White and Black African – 1.20% (125)
How does White City compare to other wards in Hammersmith and Fulham ?
Rank of White City when compared against Hammersmith and Fulham wards.
- Black, Black British, Black Welsh, Caribbean or African – rank – 1 (26.67%)
- African – rank – 1 (18.75%)
- Other Black – rank – 2 (2.30%)
- Caribbean – rank – 4 (5.62%)
- Other ethnic group – rank – 3 (9.84%)
- Any other ethnic group – rank – 3 (5.82%)
- Arab – rank – 5 (4.02%)
- Asian, Asian British or Asian Welsh – rank – 4 (12.81%)
- Bangladeshi – rank – 1 (1.83%)
- Pakistani – rank – 1 (1.91%)
- Other Asian – rank – 3 (5.74%)
- Chinese – rank – 13 (1.81%)
- Indian – rank – 21 (1.51%)
- Mixed or Multiple ethnic groups – rank – 4 (7.56%)
- Other Mixed or Multiple ethnic groups – rank – 4 (2.69%)
- White and Black African – rank – 6 (1.20%)
- White and Black Caribbean – rank – 6 (2.16%)
- White and Asian – rank – 15 (1.51%)
- White – rank – 21 (43.12%)
- Gypsy or Irish Traveller – rank – 6 (0.06%)
- Roma – rank – 12 (0.75%)
- Other White – rank – 19 (16.38%)
- English, Welsh, Scottish, Northern Irish or British – rank – 21 (23.98%)
- Irish – rank – 21 (1.94%)
Religions in White City
Religion | Total | % of Usual residents |
---|---|---|
Christian | 4,197 | 40.38 |
Muslim | 2,565 | 24.68 |
No religion | 2,469 | 23.76 |
Not answered | 833 | 8.02 |
Buddhist | 132 | 1.27 |
Hindu | 95 | 0.91 |
Other religion | 49 | 0.47 |
Jewish | 44 | 0.42 |
Sikh | 9 | 0.09 |
How does White City compare to other wards in Hammersmith and Fulham ?
Rank of White City when compared against Hammersmith and Fulham wards.
Religion | Rank | % of Usual residents |
---|---|---|
Muslim | 1 | 24.68 |
Buddhist | 3 | 1.27 |
Not answered | 15 | 8.02 |
Hindu | 16 | 0.91 |
Jewish | 17 | 0.42 |
Sikh | 19 | 0.09 |
Other religion | 19 | 0.47 |
No religion | 21 | 23.76 |
Christian | 21 | 40.38 |
Employment and unemployment amongst White City Residents
- Economically active (excluding full-time students) – 63.67% (5,372)
- In employment – 58.22% (4,912)
- Employee – 47.30% (3,991)
- Full-time – 36.27% (3,060)
- Part-time – 11.03% (931)
- Self-employed without employees – 9.22% (778)
- Full-time – 5.00% (422)
- Part-time – 4.22% (356)
- Self-employed with employees – 1.69% (143)
- Full-time – 1.01% (85)
- Part-time – 0.69% (58)
- Unemployed – 5.45% (460)
- Economically inactive – 33.10% (2,793)
- Student – 9.24% (780)
- Retired – 7.73% (652)
- Looking after home or family – 6.51% (549)
- Other – 5.44% (459)
- Long-term sick or disabled – 4.18% (353)
- Economically active and a full-time student – 3.22% (272)
- In employment – 2.41% (203)
- Employee – 1.98% (167)
- Part-time – 1.33% (112)
- Full-time – 0.65% (55)
- Self-employed without employees – 0.38% (32)
- Part-time – 0.32% (27)
- Full-time – 0.06% (5)
- Self-employed with employees – 0.05% (4)
- Part-time – 0.05% (4)
- Full-time – 0.00% (0)
- Unemployed – 0.82% (69)
How does White City compare to other wards in Hammersmith and Fulham ?
Rank of White City when compared against Hammersmith and Fulham wards.
- Economically active and a full-time student – rank – 4 (3.22%)
- In employment – rank – 3 (2.41%)
- Employee – rank – 3 (1.98%)
- Part-time – rank – 3 (1.33%)
- Full-time – rank – 6 (0.65%)
- Self-employed with employees – rank – 6 (0.05%)
- Part-time – rank – 3 (0.05%)
- Full-time – rank – 10 (0.00%)
- Self-employed without employees – rank – 7 (0.38%)
- Full-time – rank – 6 (0.06%)
- Part-time – rank – 7 (0.32%)
- Unemployed – rank – 7 (0.82%)
- Economically inactive – rank – 9 (33.10%)
- Looking after home or family – rank – 3 (6.51%)
- Other – rank – 3 (5.44%)
- Student – rank – 6 (9.24%)
- Long-term sick or disabled – rank – 8 (4.18%)
- Retired – rank – 21 (7.73%)
- Economically active (excluding full-time students) – rank – 15 (63.67%)
- Unemployed – rank – 2 (5.45%)
- In employment – rank – 18 (58.22%)
- Self-employed with employees – rank – 12 (1.69%)
- Part-time – rank – 1 (0.69%)
- Full-time – rank – 17 (1.01%)
- Self-employed without employees – rank – 15 (9.22%)
- Part-time – rank – 15 (4.22%)
- Full-time – rank – 15 (5.00%)
- Employee – rank – 17 (47.30%)
- Part-time – rank – 1 (11.03%)
- Full-time – rank – 19 (36.27%)
Socio-economic statistics for White City
Socio Economic Classification | Total | % of Usual residents |
---|---|---|
Lower managerial, administrative and professional occupations | 1,525 | 18.08 |
Higher managerial, administrative and professional occupations | 1,234 | 14.63 |
Never worked and long-term unemployed | 1,007 | 11.94 |
Full-time students | 999 | 11.84 |
Routine occupations | 952 | 11.28 |
Semi-routine occupations | 815 | 9.66 |
Small employers and own account workers | 811 | 9.61 |
Intermediate occupations | 751 | 8.9 |
Lower supervisory and technical occupations | 343 | 4.07 |
How does White City compare to other wards in Hammersmith and Fulham ?
Rank of White City when compared against Hammersmith and Fulham wards.
Socio Economic Classification | Rank | % of Usual residents |
---|---|---|
Semi-routine occupations | 1 | 9.66 |
Routine occupations | 1 | 11.28 |
Intermediate occupations | 2 | 8.9 |
Never worked and long-term unemployed | 3 | 11.94 |
Lower supervisory and technical occupations | 5 | 4.07 |
Full-time students | 7 | 11.84 |
Small employers and own account workers | 12 | 9.61 |
Higher managerial, administrative and professional occupations | 19 | 14.63 |
Lower managerial, administrative and professional occupations | 21 | 18.08 |
Occupation groups in White City
Occupation | Total | % of Usual residents |
---|---|---|
Professional occupations | 1,156 | 22.6 |
Associate professional and technical | 820 | 16.03 |
Managers, directors and senior officials | 664 | 12.98 |
Elementary | 608 | 11.89 |
Caring, leisure and other service | 541 | 10.58 |
Administrative and secretarial | 413 | 8.08 |
Sales and customer service | 364 | 7.12 |
Skilled trades | 296 | 5.79 |
Process, plant and machine operatives | 252 | 4.93 |
How does White City compare to other wards in Hammersmith and Fulham ?
Rank of White City when compared against Hammersmith and Fulham wards.
Occupation | Rank | % of Usual residents |
---|---|---|
Caring, leisure and other service | 1 | 10.58 |
Elementary | 1 | 11.89 |
Administrative and secretarial | 2 | 8.08 |
Sales and customer service | 2 | 7.12 |
Process, plant and machine operatives | 2 | 4.93 |
Skilled trades | 5 | 5.79 |
Managers, directors and senior officials | 20 | 12.98 |
Associate professional and technical | 20 | 16.03 |
Professional occupations | 21 | 22.6 |