White City

According to the 2021 census, White City had a total of 17,860 usual residents residing in 4,202 households, indicating an average household size of 2.5. The borough covers an area of 34.7 square kilometers resulting in a population density of 17,860.5 individuals per square kilometer. The average age of its residents was 34.7 years.

Religion: In White City, the ‘Christian’ community represents the largest religious group, making up 40.38% of the population, ‘Muslim’ population follows at 24.68% and ‘No religion’ is 3rd with 23.76%

Ethnic groups: The predominant ethnic group in White City is ‘White’, constituting 43.12% of the total population. The ‘Black, Black British, Black Welsh, Caribbean or African’ ethnic group is second largest, making up 26.67%, while ‘Asian, Asian British or Asian Welsh’ accounts for 12.81%.

Economic activity: 63.67% of White City’s population is economically active. The primary job roles are ‘Professional occupations’ and ‘Associate professional and technical’

Essential tools against vehicle theft

Essential tools against vehicle theft.

Health: Majority of the population are in very good health. Most common age groups are those aged 35 to 49 years and aged 50 to 64 years. Additionally, 29.59% of its inhabitants is married and 56.79% are single.

Living Arrangements and Property Types: Majority of the households are Single family households (53.73%). Most of the properties in White City are flats, with the majority of the ownership either being social rented or private rented

Crime rate: As of 2022, White City crime rate (crime per 1000 residents) stands at 199.85. Most common crime types are ‘Anti-social behaviour’, ‘Violence and sexual offences’ and ‘Other theft’.

White City in comparision with 21 Hammersmith and Fulham wards

When we analyze the percentage distribution of population and households, we see that White City surpasses most of Hammersmith and Fulham wards in the following metrics.

Prominent demographics insights:
  1. Age:
    • Aged 10 to 15 years- Rank (2)
    • Aged 16 to 19 years- Rank (2)
    • Aged 5 to 9 years- Rank (4)
  2. Economic activity status:
    • Economically active and a full-time student- Rank (4)
    • Economically inactive- Rank (9)
  3. Ethnic group:
    • Black, Black British, Black Welsh, Caribbean or African- Rank (1)
    • Other ethnic group- Rank (3)
    • Asian, Asian British or Asian Welsh- Rank (4)
  4. General health:
    • Fair health- Rank (6)
    • Good health- Rank (7)
    • Bad health- Rank (8)
  5. Marital and civil partnership status:
    • Separated, but still legally married or still legally in a civil partnership- Rank (2)
    • Divorced or civil partnership dissolved- Rank (4)

Prominent household insights:
  1. Accommodation type:
    • Flats- Rank (1)
    • Converted building. Eg school, church- Rank (8)
    • Commercial building. Eg office, hotel, shop- Rank (9)
  2. Household composition:
    • Single family household- Rank (5)
    • Other household types- Rank (7)
  3. Household deprivation:
    • Household is deprived in one dimension- Rank (3)
    • Household is deprived in three dimensions- Rank (3)
    • Household is deprived in four dimensions- Rank (3)
  4. Tenure of household:
    • Social rented- Rank (3)
    • Shared ownership- Rank (6)

Unlock Insights: Explore, Compare, and Visualize White City data

Explore the detailed composition and makeup of White City‘s census data through an easy-to-use UI, featuring interactive visualization tools. Analyze how White City compares to other wards within Hammersmith and Fulham.

View all insights

Property types in White City

Accommodation Type Total % of Households
Flats 2,856 68.02
Converted or shared house 685 16.31
Terraced 384 9.15
Semi-detached 103 2.45
Commercial building. Eg office, hotel, shop 78 1.86
Converted building. Eg school, church 54 1.29
Detached 37 0.88
Caravan or other mobile structure 2 0.05

How does White City compare to other wards in Hammersmith and Fulham ?

Rank of White City when compared against Hammersmith and Fulham wards.

Accommodation Type Rank % of Households
Flats 1 68.02
Converted building. Eg school, church 8 1.29
Commercial building. Eg office, hotel, shop 9 1.86
Detached 11 0.88
Caravan or other mobile structure 13 0.05
Semi-detached 15 2.45
Terraced 18 9.15
Converted or shared house 18 16.31

Property ownership in White City

  1. Social rented – 45.75% (1,922)
    1. Rents from council or Local Authority – 34.94% (1,468)
    2. Other social rented – 10.81% (454)
  2. Private rented – 30.52% (1,282)
    1. Private landlord or letting agency – 28.33% (1,190)
    2. Other private rented – 2.19% (92)
  3. Owned – 21.66% (910)
    1. Owns with a mortgage or loan – 11.97% (503)
    2. Owns outright – 9.69% (407)
  4. Shared ownership – 1.67% (70)
    1. Shared ownership – 1.67% (70)

How does White City compare to other wards in Hammersmith and Fulham ?

Rank of White City when compared against Hammersmith and Fulham wards.

  1. Social rented – rank – 3 (45.75%)
    1. Rents from council or Local Authority – rank – 1 (34.94%)
    2. Other social rented – rank – 17 (10.81%)
  2. Shared ownership – rank – 6 (1.67%)
    1. Shared ownership – rank – 6 (1.67%)
  3. Private rented – rank – 18 (30.52%)
    1. Private landlord or letting agency – rank – 18 (28.33%)
    2. Other private rented – rank – 18 (2.19%)
  4. Owned – rank – 19 (21.66%)
    1. Owns with a mortgage or loan – rank – 19 (11.97%)
    2. Owns outright – rank – 20 (9.69%)

Families in White City

  1. Single family household – 53.73% (2,255)
    1. Married or civil partnership couple – 21.49% (902)
      1. Dependent children – 11.84% (497)
      2. No children – 5.81% (244)
      3. All children non-dependent – 3.84% (161)
    2. Lone parent family – 19.44% (816)
      1. With dependent children – 11.44% (480)
      2. All children non-dependent – 8.01% (336)
    3. Cohabiting couple family – 8.82% (370)
      1. No children – 6.10% (256)
      2. With dependent children – 2.24% (94)
      3. All children non-dependent – 0.48% (20)
    4. Other single family household – 2.50% (105)
      1. Other family composition – 2.50% (105)
    5. All aged 66 years and over – 1.48% (62)
  2. One person household – 31.33% (1,315)
    1. Other – 24.85% (1,043)
    2. Aged 66 years and over – 6.48% (272)
  3. Other household types – 14.94% (627)
    1. Other, including all full-time students and all aged 66 years and over – 11.08% (465)
    2. With dependent children – 3.86% (162)

How does White City compare to other wards in Hammersmith and Fulham ?

Rank of White City when compared against Hammersmith and Fulham wards.

  1. Single family household – rank – 5 (53.73%)
    1. Lone parent family – rank – 1 (19.44%)
      1. With dependent children – rank – 1 (11.44%)
      2. All children non-dependent – rank – 3 (8.01%)
    2. Other single family household – rank – 8 (2.50%)
      1. Other family composition – rank – 8 (2.50%)
    3. Married or civil partnership couple – rank – 10 (21.49%)
      1. All children non-dependent – rank – 5 (3.84%)
      2. Dependent children – rank – 10 (11.84%)
      3. No children – rank – 19 (5.81%)
    4. All aged 66 years and over – rank – 19 (1.48%)
    5. Cohabiting couple family – rank – 19 (8.82%)
      1. With dependent children – rank – 1 (2.24%)
      2. All children non-dependent – rank – 6 (0.48%)
      3. No children – rank – 19 (6.10%)
  2. Other household types – rank – 7 (14.94%)
    1. With dependent children – rank – 2 (3.86%)
    2. Other, including all full-time students and all aged 66 years and over – rank – 10 (11.08%)
  3. One person household – rank – 17 (31.33%)
    1. Other – rank – 15 (24.85%)
    2. Aged 66 years and over – rank – 21 (6.48%)

White City household deprivation

Household Deprivation Total % of Households
Household is not deprived in any dimension 1,746 41.55
Household is deprived in one dimension 1,494 35.55
Household is deprived in two dimensions 697 16.59
Household is deprived in three dimensions 242 5.76
Household is deprived in four dimensions 23 0.55

How does White City compare to other wards in Hammersmith and Fulham ?

Rank of White City when compared against Hammersmith and Fulham wards.

Household Deprivation Rank % of Households
Household is deprived in one dimension 3 35.55
Household is deprived in three dimensions 3 5.76
Household is deprived in four dimensions 3 0.55
Household is deprived in two dimensions 4 16.59
Household is not deprived in any dimension 19 41.55

Household sizes in White City

Household Size Total % of Households
1 person in household 1,315 31.29
2 people in household 1,236 29.41
3 people in household 752 17.89
4 people in household 465 11.06
5 people in household 248 5.9
6 people in household 108 2.57
7 people in household 41 0.98
8 or more people in household 38 0.9

How does White City compare to other wards in Hammersmith and Fulham ?

Rank of White City when compared against Hammersmith and Fulham wards.

Household Size Rank % of Households
8 or more people in household 1 0.9
0 people in household 1 0
3 people in household 2 17.89
6 people in household 2 2.57
7 people in household 2 0.98
5 people in household 3 5.9
4 people in household 7 11.06
1 person in household 17 31.29
2 people in household 19 29.41

Age groups of White City residents

Age Total % of Usual residents
Aged 35 to 49 years 2,214 21.31
Aged 50 to 64 years 1,709 16.45
Aged 25 to 34 years 942 9.07
Aged 10 to 15 years 851 8.19
Aged 5 to 9 years 574 5.53
Aged 4 years and under 532 5.12
Aged 65 to 74 years 506 4.87
Aged 16 to 19 years 505 4.86
Aged 75 to 84 years 256 2.46
Aged 85 years and over 81 0.78

How does White City compare to other wards in Hammersmith and Fulham ?

Rank of White City when compared against Hammersmith and Fulham wards.

Age Rank % of Usual residents
Aged 10 to 15 years 2 8.19
Aged 16 to 19 years 2 4.86
Aged 5 to 9 years 4 5.53
Aged 4 years and under 8 5.12
Aged 25 to 34 years 11 9.07
Aged 50 to 64 years 12 16.45
Aged 35 to 49 years 15 21.31
Aged 85 years and over 20 0.78
Aged 65 to 74 years 21 4.87
Aged 75 to 84 years 21 2.46

Gender breakdown in White City

Sex Total % of Usual residents
Female 5,529 53.2
Male 4,864 46.8

How does White City compare to other wards in Hammersmith and Fulham ?

Rank of White City when compared against Hammersmith and Fulham wards.

Sex Rank % of Usual residents
Female 8 53.2
Male 14 46.8

White City Health status

General Health Total % of Usual residents
Very good health 5,869 56.47
Good health 3,032 29.17
Fair health 1,025 9.86
Bad health 359 3.45
Very bad health 108 1.04

How does White City compare to other wards in Hammersmith and Fulham ?

Rank of White City when compared against Hammersmith and Fulham wards.

General Health Rank % of Usual residents
Fair health 6 9.86
Good health 7 29.17
Bad health 8 3.45
Very bad health 12 1.04
Very good health 14 56.47

Relationship status amongst White City Residents

  1. Never married and never registered a civil partnership – 56.79% (4,793)
  2. Married or in a registered civil partnership – 29.59% (2,497)
    1. Married – 29.25% (2,469)
      1. Opposite sex – 28.95% (2,443)
      2. Same sex – 0.31% (26)
    2. In a registered civil partnership – 0.33% (28)
      1. Same sex – 0.25% (21)
      2. Opposite sex – 0.08% (7)
  3. Divorced or civil partnership dissolved – 7.97% (673)
    1. Divorced – 7.95% (671)
    2. Formerly in a civil partnership now legally dissolved – 0.02% (2)
  4. Widowed or surviving civil partnership partner – 2.88% (243)
    1. Widowed – 2.84% (240)
    2. Surviving partner from civil partnership – 0.04% (3)
  5. Separated, but still legally married or still legally in a civil partnership – 2.77% (234)
    1. Separated, but still married – 2.77% (234)
    2. Separated, but still in a registered civil partnership – 0.00% (0)

How does White City compare to other wards in Hammersmith and Fulham ?

Rank of White City when compared against Hammersmith and Fulham wards.

  1. Separated, but still legally married or still legally in a civil partnership – rank – 2 (2.77%)
    1. Separated, but still married – rank – 2 (2.77%)
    2. Separated, but still in a registered civil partnership – rank – 17 (0.00%)
  2. Divorced or civil partnership dissolved – rank – 4 (7.97%)
    1. Divorced – rank – 4 (7.95%)
    2. Formerly in a civil partnership now legally dissolved – rank – 16 (0.02%)
  3. Married or in a registered civil partnership – rank – 11 (29.59%)
    1. Married – rank – 11 (29.25%)
      1. Opposite sex – rank – 11 (28.95%)
      2. Same sex – rank – 19 (0.31%)
    2. In a registered civil partnership – rank – 16 (0.33%)
      1. Opposite sex – rank – 13 (0.08%)
      2. Same sex – rank – 15 (0.25%)
  4. Never married and never registered a civil partnership – rank – 13 (56.79%)
  5. Widowed or surviving civil partnership partner – rank – 13 (2.88%)
    1. Surviving partner from civil partnership – rank – 4 (0.04%)
    2. Widowed – rank – 14 (2.84%)

White City residents’ country of birth

  1. Europe – 69.20% (7,192)
    1. United Kingdom – 51.70% (5,373)
    2. EU countries – 14.25% (1,481)
      1. European Union EU14 – 9.70% (1,008)
      2. European Union EU8 – 3.14% (326)
      3. European Union EU2 – 1.07% (111)
      4. All other EU countries – 0.35% (36)
    3. Non-EU countries – 3.25% (338)
      1. All other non-EU countries – 3.25% (338)
  2. Africa – 12.83% (1,333)
  3. Middle East and Asia – 11.38% (1,183)
  4. The Americas and the Caribbean – 5.71% (593)
  5. Antarctica and Oceania (including Australasia) and Other – 0.80% (83)
  6. British Overseas – 0.09% (9)

How does White City compare to other wards in Hammersmith and Fulham ?

Rank of White City when compared against Hammersmith and Fulham wards.

  1. Africa – rank – 1 (12.83%)
  2. British Overseas – rank – 2 (0.09%)
  3. Middle East and Asia – rank – 6 (11.38%)
  4. The Americas and the Caribbean – rank – 18 (5.71%)
  5. Europe – rank – 20 (69.20%)
    1. Non-EU countries – rank – 10 (3.25%)
      1. All other non-EU countries – rank – 10 (3.25%)
    2. United Kingdom – rank – 14 (51.70%)
    3. EU countries – rank – 21 (14.25%)
      1. European Union EU8 – rank – 4 (3.14%)
      2. European Union EU2 – rank – 12 (1.07%)
      3. All other EU countries – rank – 15 (0.35%)
      4. European Union EU14 – rank – 21 (9.70%)
  6. Antarctica and Oceania (including Australasia) and Other – rank – 21 (0.80%)

Passport records of White City residents

  1. Europe – 87.84% (9,128)
    1. United Kingdom – 70.05% (7,280)
    2. Other Europe – 16.11% (1,674)
      1. EU Member countries – 14.95% (1,554)
        1. Other EU countries – 3.79% (394)
        2. Italy – 2.85% (296)
        3. Spain – 1.87% (194)
        4. Poland – 1.68% (175)
        5. France – 1.57% (163)
        6. Portugal – 1.40% (146)
        7. Romania – 0.72% (75)
        8. Germany – 0.61% (63)
        9. Lithuania – 0.46% (48)
      2. Rest of Europe – 1.15% (120)
        1. Other Europe – 0.93% (97)
        2. Turkey – 0.22% (23)
    3. Ireland – 1.67% (174)
  2. No passport held – 4.88% (507)
  3. Middle East and Asia – 3.60% (374)
    1. South-East Asia – 1.25% (130)
    2. Eastern Asia – 1.21% (126)
    3. Southern Asia – 0.73% (76)
    4. Middle East – 0.39% (41)
    5. Central Asia – 0.01% (1)
  4. The Americas and the Caribbean – 1.77% (184)
    1. North America and the Caribbean – 1.02% (106)
    2. Central and South America – 0.75% (78)
  5. Africa – 1.36% (141)
    1. Central and Western Africa – 0.71% (74)
    2. North Africa – 0.38% (39)
    3. South and Eastern Africa – 0.27% (28)
  6. Antarctica and Oceania, including Australasia – 0.55% (57)

How does White City compare to other wards in Hammersmith and Fulham ?

Rank of White City when compared against Hammersmith and Fulham wards.

  1. British Overseas Territories – rank – 1 (0.00%)
  2. No passport held – rank – 2 (4.88%)
  3. Africa – rank – 3 (1.36%)
    1. Central and Western Africa – rank – 1 (0.71%)
    2. North Africa – rank – 9 (0.38%)
    3. South and Eastern Africa – rank – 17 (0.27%)
  4. Europe – rank – 8 (87.84%)
    1. United Kingdom – rank – 5 (70.05%)
    2. Other Europe – rank – 16 (16.11%)
      1. Rest of Europe – rank – 15 (1.15%)
        1. Turkey – rank – 13 (0.22%)
        2. Other Europe – rank – 14 (0.93%)
      2. EU Member countries – rank – 16 (14.95%)
        1. Poland – rank – 2 (1.68%)
        2. Portugal – rank – 3 (1.40%)
        3. Lithuania – rank – 4 (0.46%)
        4. Romania – rank – 7 (0.72%)
        5. Other EU countries – rank – 11 (3.79%)
        6. Italy – rank – 15 (2.85%)
        7. Spain – rank – 15 (1.87%)
        8. Germany – rank – 17 (0.61%)
        9. France – rank – 20 (1.57%)
    3. Ireland – rank – 20 (1.67%)
  5. Middle East and Asia – rank – 12 (3.60%)
    1. South-East Asia – rank – 6 (1.25%)
    2. Eastern Asia – rank – 11 (1.21%)
    3. Middle East – rank – 12 (0.39%)
    4. Southern Asia – rank – 12 (0.73%)
    5. Central Asia – rank – 13 (0.01%)
  6. The Americas and the Caribbean – rank – 19 (1.77%)
    1. Central and South America – rank – 15 (0.75%)
    2. North America and the Caribbean – rank – 19 (1.02%)
  7. Antarctica and Oceania, including Australasia – rank – 21 (0.55%)

Ethnic groups in White City

  1. White – 43.12% (4,482)
    1. English, Welsh, Scottish, Northern Irish or British – 23.98% (2,493)
    2. Other White – 16.38% (1,703)
    3. Irish – 1.94% (202)
    4. Roma – 0.75% (78)
    5. Gypsy or Irish Traveller – 0.06% (6)
  2. Black, Black British, Black Welsh, Caribbean or African – 26.67% (2,772)
    1. African – 18.75% (1,949)
    2. Caribbean – 5.62% (584)
    3. Other Black – 2.30% (239)
  3. Asian, Asian British or Asian Welsh – 12.81% (1,331)
    1. Other Asian – 5.74% (597)
    2. Pakistani – 1.91% (199)
    3. Bangladeshi – 1.83% (190)
    4. Chinese – 1.81% (188)
    5. Indian – 1.51% (157)
  4. Other ethnic group – 9.84% (1,023)
    1. Any other ethnic group – 5.82% (605)
    2. Arab – 4.02% (418)
  5. Mixed or Multiple ethnic groups – 7.56% (786)
    1. Other Mixed or Multiple ethnic groups – 2.69% (280)
    2. White and Black Caribbean – 2.16% (224)
    3. White and Asian – 1.51% (157)
    4. White and Black African – 1.20% (125)

How does White City compare to other wards in Hammersmith and Fulham ?

Rank of White City when compared against Hammersmith and Fulham wards.

  1. Black, Black British, Black Welsh, Caribbean or African – rank – 1 (26.67%)
    1. African – rank – 1 (18.75%)
    2. Other Black – rank – 2 (2.30%)
    3. Caribbean – rank – 4 (5.62%)
  2. Other ethnic group – rank – 3 (9.84%)
    1. Any other ethnic group – rank – 3 (5.82%)
    2. Arab – rank – 5 (4.02%)
  3. Asian, Asian British or Asian Welsh – rank – 4 (12.81%)
    1. Bangladeshi – rank – 1 (1.83%)
    2. Pakistani – rank – 1 (1.91%)
    3. Other Asian – rank – 3 (5.74%)
    4. Chinese – rank – 13 (1.81%)
    5. Indian – rank – 21 (1.51%)
  4. Mixed or Multiple ethnic groups – rank – 4 (7.56%)
    1. Other Mixed or Multiple ethnic groups – rank – 4 (2.69%)
    2. White and Black African – rank – 6 (1.20%)
    3. White and Black Caribbean – rank – 6 (2.16%)
    4. White and Asian – rank – 15 (1.51%)
  5. White – rank – 21 (43.12%)
    1. Gypsy or Irish Traveller – rank – 6 (0.06%)
    2. Roma – rank – 12 (0.75%)
    3. Other White – rank – 19 (16.38%)
    4. English, Welsh, Scottish, Northern Irish or British – rank – 21 (23.98%)
    5. Irish – rank – 21 (1.94%)

Religions in White City

Religion Total % of Usual residents
Christian 4,197 40.38
Muslim 2,565 24.68
No religion 2,469 23.76
Not answered 833 8.02
Buddhist 132 1.27
Hindu 95 0.91
Other religion 49 0.47
Jewish 44 0.42
Sikh 9 0.09

How does White City compare to other wards in Hammersmith and Fulham ?

Rank of White City when compared against Hammersmith and Fulham wards.

Religion Rank % of Usual residents
Muslim 1 24.68
Buddhist 3 1.27
Not answered 15 8.02
Hindu 16 0.91
Jewish 17 0.42
Sikh 19 0.09
Other religion 19 0.47
No religion 21 23.76
Christian 21 40.38

Employment and unemployment amongst White City Residents

  1. Economically active (excluding full-time students) – 63.67% (5,372)
    1. In employment – 58.22% (4,912)
      1. Employee – 47.30% (3,991)
        1. Full-time – 36.27% (3,060)
        2. Part-time – 11.03% (931)
      2. Self-employed without employees – 9.22% (778)
        1. Full-time – 5.00% (422)
        2. Part-time – 4.22% (356)
      3. Self-employed with employees – 1.69% (143)
        1. Full-time – 1.01% (85)
        2. Part-time – 0.69% (58)
    2. Unemployed – 5.45% (460)
  2. Economically inactive – 33.10% (2,793)
    1. Student – 9.24% (780)
    2. Retired – 7.73% (652)
    3. Looking after home or family – 6.51% (549)
    4. Other – 5.44% (459)
    5. Long-term sick or disabled – 4.18% (353)
  3. Economically active and a full-time student – 3.22% (272)
    1. In employment – 2.41% (203)
      1. Employee – 1.98% (167)
        1. Part-time – 1.33% (112)
        2. Full-time – 0.65% (55)
      2. Self-employed without employees – 0.38% (32)
        1. Part-time – 0.32% (27)
        2. Full-time – 0.06% (5)
      3. Self-employed with employees – 0.05% (4)
        1. Part-time – 0.05% (4)
        2. Full-time – 0.00% (0)
    2. Unemployed – 0.82% (69)

How does White City compare to other wards in Hammersmith and Fulham ?

Rank of White City when compared against Hammersmith and Fulham wards.

  1. Economically active and a full-time student – rank – 4 (3.22%)
    1. In employment – rank – 3 (2.41%)
      1. Employee – rank – 3 (1.98%)
        1. Part-time – rank – 3 (1.33%)
        2. Full-time – rank – 6 (0.65%)
      2. Self-employed with employees – rank – 6 (0.05%)
        1. Part-time – rank – 3 (0.05%)
        2. Full-time – rank – 10 (0.00%)
      3. Self-employed without employees – rank – 7 (0.38%)
        1. Full-time – rank – 6 (0.06%)
        2. Part-time – rank – 7 (0.32%)
    2. Unemployed – rank – 7 (0.82%)
  2. Economically inactive – rank – 9 (33.10%)
    1. Looking after home or family – rank – 3 (6.51%)
    2. Other – rank – 3 (5.44%)
    3. Student – rank – 6 (9.24%)
    4. Long-term sick or disabled – rank – 8 (4.18%)
    5. Retired – rank – 21 (7.73%)
  3. Economically active (excluding full-time students) – rank – 15 (63.67%)
    1. Unemployed – rank – 2 (5.45%)
    2. In employment – rank – 18 (58.22%)
      1. Self-employed with employees – rank – 12 (1.69%)
        1. Part-time – rank – 1 (0.69%)
        2. Full-time – rank – 17 (1.01%)
      2. Self-employed without employees – rank – 15 (9.22%)
        1. Part-time – rank – 15 (4.22%)
        2. Full-time – rank – 15 (5.00%)
      3. Employee – rank – 17 (47.30%)
        1. Part-time – rank – 1 (11.03%)
        2. Full-time – rank – 19 (36.27%)

Socio-economic statistics for White City

Socio Economic Classification Total % of Usual residents
Lower managerial, administrative and professional occupations 1,525 18.08
Higher managerial, administrative and professional occupations 1,234 14.63
Never worked and long-term unemployed 1,007 11.94
Full-time students 999 11.84
Routine occupations 952 11.28
Semi-routine occupations 815 9.66
Small employers and own account workers 811 9.61
Intermediate occupations 751 8.9
Lower supervisory and technical occupations 343 4.07

How does White City compare to other wards in Hammersmith and Fulham ?

Rank of White City when compared against Hammersmith and Fulham wards.

Socio Economic Classification Rank % of Usual residents
Semi-routine occupations 1 9.66
Routine occupations 1 11.28
Intermediate occupations 2 8.9
Never worked and long-term unemployed 3 11.94
Lower supervisory and technical occupations 5 4.07
Full-time students 7 11.84
Small employers and own account workers 12 9.61
Higher managerial, administrative and professional occupations 19 14.63
Lower managerial, administrative and professional occupations 21 18.08

Occupation groups in White City

Occupation Total % of Usual residents
Professional occupations 1,156 22.6
Associate professional and technical 820 16.03
Managers, directors and senior officials 664 12.98
Elementary 608 11.89
Caring, leisure and other service 541 10.58
Administrative and secretarial 413 8.08
Sales and customer service 364 7.12
Skilled trades 296 5.79
Process, plant and machine operatives 252 4.93

How does White City compare to other wards in Hammersmith and Fulham ?

Rank of White City when compared against Hammersmith and Fulham wards.

Occupation Rank % of Usual residents
Caring, leisure and other service 1 10.58
Elementary 1 11.89
Administrative and secretarial 2 8.08
Sales and customer service 2 7.12
Process, plant and machine operatives 2 4.93
Skilled trades 5 5.79
Managers, directors and senior officials 20 12.98
Associate professional and technical 20 16.03
Professional occupations 21 22.6